Jules wrote:
Put it simply - whilst both ratio gives u the same ending ( top speed ), the manner how u get there differs! The bigger front pinion should give u a better initial response, me thinks.
Can you explain why a bigger drive sprocket would give better initial response?
If it's because of the "leverage" you get on a larger front sprocket which allows it to initially pull harder remember that we aren't accelerating the engine, but the engine is accelerating the kart - any leverage action doesn't work because the chain isn't pulling the engine, the engine is rotating the crankshaft, which has a sprocket attached to it which is attached to the rear axle by another sprocket and the chain. The size of that sprocket within reasonable sizes shouldn't make any difference (other than unmeasurable ones in load from heavier/lighter sprockets+chain and different chain wrap, and the wear differences) if the ratio is kept the same.
The leverage action where torque occurs in an engine is on the down-stroke of the piston, which pushes down the conrod, which rotates the crankshaft. The size of the front front sprocket does not come into play - the engine doesn't take leverage from the outside of the front sprocket, only on the crankshaft when it spins it.
The reason we have sprockets and a chain to connect the engine to the axle is because we need a reduction in the rotation speed - if it was a 1:1 ratio there wouldn't be enough torque to accelerate the kart. With a 7:1 ratio for example we create a torque multiplier giving the engine enough grunt to move the kart forward.
Here's one way to visualize it - say we do use a 1:1 ratio and now both our front and rear sprockets are the same. Now we have a 12 front and a 12 rear... now change that to a 70 front and a 70 rear - why will there be a difference in the way the power is transfered to the rear axle?
I have always thought that a ratio is a ratio and the only reason you change from say a 12 to a 13 is your rear sprocket is getting a bit too big for comfort. I've yet to read anyone explain the theory behind why different sprockets with the same ratio would provide different results, but many feel that it does. I should add that I've also never tried the same ratio with different sets of sprockets back-to-back before, simply because I don't see the point - but I am interested to find out why there would be a difference
Daniel: the only way to make that work would be to make it a blind test.
