For me there were two really interesting things about the results (and both should stip up some debate because some will disagree) :
1) The mix of chassis and the equality between them. 4 different brands won in 5 categories, or 4 from 4 if you exclude DD2 - I'd rather not because that gave GP Racing the kudos of being the only double winner

. But it should now be clear to everyone that the differences in the chassis brands are minimal - the driver and set-up makes the difference. Mikko finished 2nd in seniors with the "cheap" model of Intrepid.
2) In the younger age groups, experience means a lot during the races. In cadets, the "usual suspects" came to the fore during the races. The less experienced kids - like Max and James - were very quick in practice but haven't developed the racecraft yet to really fight at the front in the races. The same is true in juniors. Zarul - last year's cadet champion and winner at the Sangari race - has also been quick in practice but didn't show that well in the races. He ran top 10 in a few of the races but faded towards the end of the longer races. You could even say the same about Tim - he's stunningly fast but is probably still learning a bit to race in juniors and how to make the right decisions in races. So, two messages for parents - be patient, it probably takes 2 years to develop consistency and racecraft in cadets and at least a year in juniors and particularly in juniors, strength and fitness need to be developed as well. Juniors to seniors is easy, same karts, same speed (or a bit slower because of weight), Nabil and others before him have shown it's no problem to transition.
Before anyone jumps up and starts screaming, all the examples I've used above to illustrate the point are really good drivers and will win races, maybe even this year (especially Tim), but they are at a disadvantage against their more experienced competitors.